A
Voice from the Past: Rediscovering the Writings of John Jacob Glessner
Presented by William Tyre, Arthur Baer
Fellow
It is a privilege to
speak to you this evening about John Jacob Glessner, an individual I never met
but have deeply respected for many years.
You may know the name because of the home he and his wife Frances built
on
Glessner was a devoted
member of the Chicago Literary Club. He
joined the club in 1883, less than a decade after the group was formed, and
remained active until his death in 1936, a remarkable 53 years of
membership. During that time he served
as Chair of both the “Rooms and Finance” and “Officers and Members” committees
and delivered a total of six papers. The
museum is fortunate to have four of those papers in their archives, along with
several others that he prepared for the club but never delivered.
He was also a dedicated
member of the Cliff Dweller’s Club, so it is especially appropriate that this
talk is being given in these surroundings. When the original club rooms were dedicated in
January 1909, his wife recounted the following in her journal:
“John went to the opening of the Cliff Dwellers room above Orchestra
Hall. John
presented
the club with the two mantel pieces and fire irons. They had a ceremony
lighting
the two fires.”
The Chicago Tribune provided
additional information on the ceremony, stating that the andirons were piled
with driftwood from the
Glessner’s ancestors
arrived in this country about 1745, emigrating from the
“I come of good stock; not especially distinguished perhaps, but there
is good blood
in
my veins. My forebears were cultivated,
gentle people, and so far as I have been
able
to discover there is no taint of dishonor or scandal connected with any of
them.”
In the 1830s, Jacob Glessner moved to
In 1928, John Glessner
wrote an account of his life, including his early years in
“Once upon a time – so ran the tales that beguiled my youth. A more modern
fiction
writer has said that men are born, live, make love, marry, suffer, and fall
asleep. Only one of these experiences is due to me:
the others are mine already.
I
am moved to set them down, not in ordered sequence of time or of subject, but
haphazard
as memory comes, and not thinking them important, but for my own
entertainment
principally. Possibly my son or my
daughter, or perchance my
grandchildren,
may spend an hour with before discarding them.”
In spite of Glessner’s characteristic modesty, the manuscript makes for
fascinating reading. He captures the era
of his youth with utmost precision, from the games he played to the characters
he encountered. He relates learning
Pitman shorthand directly from its creator; observing travelers on the
In 1861, Jacob Glessner
was elected to the
“My father gave me my railroad ticket and ten dollars in money. He would have
given
me more had he been able. With these
small funds I started for
as
callow and inexperienced as any boy every was, and as lonesome, but
determined
to succeed if I could, and I have been in that same business ever since.”
An interesting side note involves his sister’s house, which she and her
husband had built. After they moved from
there, the house was sold to a friend, Major William McKinley, who later served
as Governor of Ohio and President of the
Glessner did well for
himself, focusing mostly on the accounting end of the business, and quickly
earned the respect and trust of his employers.
As various other men in the company went off to the Civil War, his
duties expanded to include overseeing the shipping department, so that
frequently he was putting in 18 hours a day.
His industriousness paid off – within five years of starting with the
firm he had saved in excess of $10,000, a good return on the $10 he had in his
pocket when he arrived in
During this period, his
lodging consisted of a rented room with the Macbeth family. It was here that he met his future bride
Frances, five years his junior. With
sufficient funds in hand, and the position of junior partner, he felt ready to
make the next major step in his life. He
approached Mr. Warder and asked that he be allowed to go to
The wedding took place
on
“The
watchman from my office and warehouse, faithful Dick Cunningham, came that
Sunday
evening to say I ought to go down to look after things, as the fire was but
half a
block
away. Of course I went, and stayed there
or nearby until morning. I crossed the
river
and stood at the corner of
saw
the blaze blown across the river, strike the west wall of a large brick
building on
the
opposite corner, suck down that wall and back along the roadway to my feet, so
that
I
had to get away. It is impossible to
express the grandeur or the scene, and the horror.
Had
there been plenty, no amount of water could have extinguished that blaze. Fanned
by
a strong southwest wind, it swept over the whole business section, crossed the
main
branch
of the river and burned the North Side, factories, residences, water works, and
everything. Fortunately the fire did not come nearer than
the half block to my building,
and
my home was a mile and a half away.”
The business grew
steadily from the day Glessner arrived in
A second child, a son
named John Francis, was born in October 1874, but was sickly from the start,
and required constant care from his mother day and night. Glessner recounts the infant’s passing just
eight months later:
“
breath,
and with apparent effort, spoke the only word he ever uttered in his life –
Mama.
Loving
friends laid his little body out. I feel
sure that had medical science known as
much
then as now we could have saved his life.”
It was at this same time that the Glessners purchased a house on the west
side at the northeast corner of Washington and Morgan, originally built by
prominent lumber dealer and mayor of
As business began to
encroach on the west side, its character as a fine residential neighborhood was
negatively impacted and the Glessners decided to move once again. Glessner at first considered purchasing the
old William B. Ogden property, a full block on the north side now occupied by
the Newberry Library. He soon abandoned
the idea however, and purchased a lot at the southwest corner of
The story of that house at
“Let me repeat here what a dear old lady, called long years ago to her
well earned
reward,
who had cultivation and wealth and refinement and discriminating intelligence,
and
was an ornament to the best social circles, once said to me – ‘You have a high
position
in Chicago, Mr. Glessner, you are a man of great prominence and importance:
you
get it from your house and your wife.’
Well, I built the one and I selected the other
and
– there you are! Perhaps some of the
glory belongs to me after all.”
When the Glessners
purchased their property on
“That remarkable street is home to merchants whose business affects
every mart on the
Earth
. . . and who possess wealth that at last aroused the jealousy of
In 1923, Glessner wrote
a wonderful account of his home entitled Story
of a House, the title borrowed from a volume in his own library by the
well-known 19th century decorative arts and architecture theorist,
Viollet-le-Duc. Photographs by Kaufman
and Fabry complimented the text. Two
copies of the text and photographs were made and placed into bound leather volumes
as keepsakes for his two children, so that they might better understand how
important the home and its collections had been to their parents. He opens the text with the following:
“Mankind is ever seeking its comforts and to achieve its ideals. The Anglo-Saxon
portion
of mankind is a home-making, home-loving race.
I think the desire is in us all
to
receive the family home from the past generation and hand it on to the next
with
possibly
some good mark of our own upon it.
Rarely can this be accomplished in this
land
of rapid changes. Families have not held
and cannot hold even to the same
localities
for their homes generation after generation, but we can at least preserve
some
memory of the old.”
“The
description of this home may give some indication of how a man of moderate
fortune
would live in the latter part of the 19th century and the earlier
part of the 20th –
an
average man with a modicum of this world’s material possessions, but by no
means
rich,
except in family and friends.”
Of particular interest, the text relates in detail the Glessners interactions
with H. H. Richardson, architect of the house.
The relationship was as perfect as any client-architect relationship
could have possibly been. The Glessners
sought out an architect with bold new ideas to create a house distinctly their
own.
“
to
his worth and ability. If genius is the
capacity for taking infinite pains he was a
great
genius, for he took infinite pains with everything he did. He built, if not for
eternity
at least for time. The monumental
structures were few, but all were striking.
The
latest of these, the County buildings at
his
work was stamped with his individuality.
It had great influence upon contemporary
architecture
and that which immediately followed, and his early death was a distinct
loss
to this country.”
By the time Glessner
wrote Story of a House, the
neighborhood around him had changed enormously – most of his neighbors had long
since abandoned the street, and many of the houses had been converted to
business use. The Glessners were
determined to stay as long as they could.
In a heartfelt letter to his son George, Glessner states, in part:
“Your Mother and I may have to leave our house
soon
can’t be told. Mrs. Gregory, Philo Otis,
and Morris Johnston are our only
neighbors
on the North, and Mrs. Blackstone and Miss Buckingham on the South. The
Henderson
house, the Kimball house, and the Otis-Jenkins house are high class
rooming
houses, and nearly all the others are business, though of very satisfactory and
unobjectionable
kind. In this state of transition of
course we cannot tell how soon
something
may happen to make our place unsatisfactory.
We have hoped we could
live
here as long as we needed a house at all, and perhaps we can, who knows. At any
rate
we shall not move until we have to.”
To ensure the preservation of the house, the Glessners deeded it to the
Chicago Chapter of the American Institute of Architects in 1924, retaining a
life interest. Unfortunately, by the
time of John Glessner’s death in 1936, the country was in the midst of the
Great Depression, and the
The years spent at
An interesting feature
of the home was its library, a large room modeled after
Both John and Frances Glessner were active in
civic and cultural affairs. Their
strongest passion was for the Symphony Orchestra, and they were intimate
friends of the founding conductor Theodore Thomas. Glessner was a lifelong trustee and he and
his wife personally raised much of the funding for Orchestra Hall, completed in
1904. They were presented with Box M,
directly behind the conductor’s podium, and it remained theirs until their
deaths. Frederick Stock, who succeeded
Thomas as conductor, dedicated his First Symphony to the Glessners in 1909. His dedication read, in part:
“This
symphony was written in honor of two well-beloved people, man and woman, who
have
won for themselves the highest esteem and loyal friendship of many of the most
worthy
dwellers in this land. Far away from
this big city of ours, with all its worldly
strife
and struggle, these two people have built for themselves and for their kin a
sylvan
retreat,
where Nature’s charms are beautiful beyond belief. It was here that the
Symphony
was first conceived, that a large part of the Scherzo and still larger portions
of
the slow movement were laid out, and here, too, the Finale was fully
outlined. To
these
two people, whom the composer is privileged to number among his best
and
dearest friends, his symphony is most affectionately dedicated.”
Glessner served as a trustee, board member, and officer at other
institutions as well including the Citizen’s Association,
“He has been reasonably successful in business and accumulated a
moderate fortune, is
somewhat
charitable, fairly public spirited, considerate of the rights of others, and
his
duty
to his community – all in the wish to justify his claim to be a good citizen.”
As president of the
Commercial Club, he led the first discussions regarding the hiring of Daniel
Burnham to create the Plan of Chicago.
He also wrote three books for the Club:
· The official club history, published in 1910;
· A history of the Merchants Club (which merged
with the Commercial Club in 1907) published in 1922; and
· Should
Auld Acquaintance Be Forgot?,
a light-hearted look at members of the club through the years, printed in 1924
as a Christmas gift for current club members.
This last publication is a great read for anyone with an interest in the
men who made
“All
were friends; of enemies there were none, yet some were
friendlier than others,
some
alas were old when I was young, and some had gone to their reward before I
became
a member. Most of them have passed away
now, each leaving as much void as
humanity
does when it is done. These were doing
men: of these I would speak. I hold
them
in honored memory, and would rejoice to call them back for an hour to talk over
the
changes since their day.
“I
would not make an exhaustive study or give an estimate of each man, or tell of
his
important
work – rather would I recall some pleasing incidents, some personal traits
or
characteristics that may bring them to mind with those who knew them, or knew
of
them.”
John Glessner wrote
actively throughout his adult life, with a significant number of manuscripts
written in the 1920s, after he retired as Vice President at International
Harvester. His writing can be grouped
into three broad categories:
· The first is his personal writings. These
include the previously quoted All The
Days of My Life, as well as several papers focusing on the Glessner family
genealogy – An Account of the Early
Glessners; Migrations, Emigrations and Transmigrations of the Glessner Family;
and Earliest Recollections.
· The second category includes writings related
to
· The final category features papers written
for presentation to the Chicago Literary Club.
These include six that were actually delivered and several more written
but not presented. Those delivered were:
Two Noted Diarists, 1885;
Potatoes, 1908;
And Thereby Hangs a
Tail, 1913;
Farming, 1915;
An October Sunday in
Graveyard Literature, 1921.
Papers completed but not presented, all written in the 1920s include:
Characters I Have Known
– Some Noteworthy – Some Not Worthy – Some Commonplace;
Men and Women; and
Daddy Roots and His Kind,
this last being an interesting look at Glessner’s view on the Negro population
based on his personal interactions through the years. He had an unusually sympathetic and
forwarding thinking view towards African Americans given the time in which he
wrote the paper. The following is a good
example:
“The
negro cannot follow the vocation for which he is best fitted; the choice is not
left
with him; he is restricted to certain generally meaner and poorly paid
occupations –
tar,
gravel and paving industries and such like; yet he is a citizen without any
entangling
alliances,
not an immigrant, and does not owe nor ever has owed allegiance to any
nation
but the
Glessner was one of a dozen business leaders who lunched with Booker T.
Washington in April 1908. Of
“I met him, as many of us have and as all of us might have. To me there was in his face
a
look of cunning which I believe belied him.
He was an able man, and a good man,
deeply
interested about his people, and devoted to their advancement. Dr.
hope
for the development of the race seems ideal to me – to make good,
self-respecting
laborers
first, then good mechanics, and so up to higher levels. The Negro came from
slavery
ill-educated, ragged, and despised: some have yet been able to become good
farmers
and mechanics, and acquire property, and more will. The self-respecting man,
whatever
his color, not too aggressive, who does well and honestly what he does, will
deserve
and receive respect. The modern man of
color, I am convinced, is to be a great
factor
in the industrial history of this country.”
His other manuscripts
show consistency in his modesty – thanking the reader or listener for their
time, and apologizing for supposed lack of literary style, although much style
is clearly evident. A dry sense of humor
also pervades his works, which also adds to their readability.
John Glessner lost his
wife and helpmate of almost 62 years in October 1932. It must have been a devastating blow to him,
for theirs was a bond of unusual closeness.
Not surprisingly, his last manuscript is a beautiful tribute to his wife
written within a few months of her passing, perhaps as a way to cope with the
grief over her loss. It is entitled Mrs. John J. Glessner – An Appreciation, A
Little History, A Tribute. A small
number of copies were printed and bound for family members. That tribute, in part, reads:
She was a home-maker, a home-preserver – that was her first ambition,
that was her
most
desired and profound success. But the
home was not to be confined within its own
four
walls. It was to bring other friends
within its sweet influence. She was a
home-
making
woman who sought not public applause.
These are not idle words: they are true
in
every sense.
“And
now her busy hands are still; her active brain is quiet; her heart and soul
have
passed
beyond this earthly sphere. What would
she have thought could she have stood
beside
me and looked down at that placid countenance in its last sleep. It was dignified,
it
was impressive, it was lovely. It was
not the same. Its spirit had fled.
“After
sixty-two years of happy married life, no tribute that I can offer seems
adequate
to
her merit. Rarely shall we look upon her
like again.”
John Glessner died on
The final words of this
paper are, of course, not his own. They
are excerpts of two tributes written shortly after his passing. The first was printed in the program for the
Chicago Symphony Orchestra on
“To no one man has The Orchestral Association been more beholden. He was one of the
small
group of men who in the Association’s first years of struggle were loyal in
their
support
and generous in their gifts. . . Modest to the point of self-effacement, he was
clean
of thought and, when occasion required, vigorous in expression, and always with
the
Association’s welfare vividly in mind.
“He
and his devoted wife while she lived were always in their box to delight in the
music
their
generosity made possible, and in their hospitable home men of the Orchestra and
their
musical friends found frequent and charming entertainment. The loss to the
Association
of his wise counsel and the loss to his fellow Trustees of his fine
companionship
find their only comfort in the reflection that he has been discharged from
the
pains and penalties of extreme old age.”
The second tribute is taken from a beautifully bound and illuminated
manuscript containing a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of
International Harvester:
“The death of Mr. Glessner deprives this Board of a member whose
ripened wisdom
and
long experience had been of value and importance in its deliberations and
decisions
ever
since the Company was organized. Until a
few days before his brief last illness he
took
an active personal interest in all matters within the province of the Board of
Directors.
“This
tribute, however, would fail of its purpose, if it did not express our
affectionate
admiration
for the character and personality of Mr. Glessner as well as our regard for
his
rare qualities as a business associate.
Innately kind, gentle and genial, he had
developed
for himself a calm and tolerant philosophy of life that endeared him to all who
knew
him, and especially to those who were privileged to participate with him in the
affairs
of the International Harvester Company and of the Board of Directors.”
John Jacob Glessner led
an incredibly rich life and witnessed extraordinary changes during his 92
years. We are fortunate that he wrote
extensively, so that the events and people that shaped that life were carefully
recorded. Although he felt much of what
he wrote would have little interest to future generations, exactly the opposite
is true. Seventy-four years after his
death, we can look back on these manuscripts and books with a deep admiration
for the man who wrote them and an equally deep appreciation for their
contents. These writings transcend time
– they chronicle the struggles and successes of one individual who contributed
to the growth and prosperity of our city.
I am humbled to present this brief look at his life and writings as I
stand before a group that he cherished for more than half a century.